<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What is Proactive Detection and Why Do You Need it?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.eset.com/blog/2007/02/23/what-is-proactive-detection-and-why-do-you-need-it/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.eset.com/blog/2007/02/23/what-is-proactive-detection-and-why-do-you-need-it</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 00:43:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Randy Abrams</title>
		<link>http://www.eset.com/blog/2007/02/23/what-is-proactive-detection-and-why-do-you-need-it/comment-page-1#comment-4842</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Abrams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 20:13:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eset.com/threat-center/blog/?p=47#comment-4842</guid>
		<description>With VirusRadar? With proactive detection? I guess it doesn&#039;t matter which the question was, I don&#039;t know the count. We certainly have less false positives than some scanners with little or no proactive capabilities. In general user find that they either encounter no false positives, or so few it is not of concern to them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With VirusRadar? With proactive detection? I guess it doesn&#8217;t matter which the question was, I don&#8217;t know the count. We certainly have less false positives than some scanners with little or no proactive capabilities. In general user find that they either encounter no false positives, or so few it is not of concern to them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ilya Rabinovich</title>
		<link>http://www.eset.com/blog/2007/02/23/what-is-proactive-detection-and-why-do-you-need-it/comment-page-1#comment-4839</link>
		<dc:creator>Ilya Rabinovich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 12:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eset.com/threat-center/blog/?p=47#comment-4839</guid>
		<description>Aha, but how many False Positives have you had with it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aha, but how many False Positives have you had with it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny</title>
		<link>http://www.eset.com/blog/2007/02/23/what-is-proactive-detection-and-why-do-you-need-it/comment-page-1#comment-4403</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 17:56:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eset.com/threat-center/blog/?p=47#comment-4403</guid>
		<description>Currently, on the virusradar.com there is a threat which shows as critical and is listed as: probably unknown NewHeur_PE virus.  It shows that the date it was first captured was 2004-03-17 19:29.  If it was captured almost 3 years ago, why has a name not been assigned to it--especially if it has become a critical threat?

Thanks,

Johnny</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Currently, on the virusradar.com there is a threat which shows as critical and is listed as: probably unknown NewHeur_PE virus.  It shows that the date it was first captured was 2004-03-17 19:29.  If it was captured almost 3 years ago, why has a name not been assigned to it&#8211;especially if it has become a critical threat?</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Johnny</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
